Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567
Results 61 to 66 of 66

Thread: I'm going with Texas

  1. #61
    Inactive Member imported_trumpet1988's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12th, 2003
    Posts
    2,533
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I'm going with Texas

    Someone finally beat USC.
    Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before.

  2. #62
    Inactive Member Xknight52's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 29th, 2005
    Posts
    2,034
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I'm going with Texas

    I love it!

    Vince is the best QB in the nation! Theres no doubt in my mind! Hope he's a titan next year! Congrats to the trogans, but it had to end sometime.
    [IMG]http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/1842/rustysig.jpg[/IMG]

  3. #63
    Inactive Member Shoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 4th, 2002
    Posts
    1,620
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I'm going with Texas

    I guess we should call Vince Young Mr.Roses or Mr.Rose Bowl. Back to back rose bowl victories against Michigan and now USC.
    "Freedom is not free, it requires great sacrafice. The price is paid in blood."

  4. #64
    Inactive Member Seventy4's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 22nd, 2005
    Posts
    268
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I'm going with Texas

    BEST QUOTE EVER!

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
    Young is the type of quarterback Vick thinks he is.

    [/ QUOTE ]


    There was an article in the July issue of Maxim about College Football and they had a column about who would be the Next Michael Vick. I think they're going to have to go back and call Michael Vick the previous Vince Young, because Young is going to be better in the long run. Want reasons?

    1. He's a team player.
    2. He's not a thug.
    3. He's faster, bigger, stronger, smarter, heck he's to Vick like the 6-Million Dollar Man is to Steve Austin. If you're too young to get that, then ask your dad.

  5. #65
    Inactive Member imported_trio's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 2nd, 2004
    Posts
    1,341
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I'm going with Texas

    I don't think Young is faster than Mike Vick.. Young is all of the other things you mentioned though..

  6. #66
    HB Forum Owner R0cketer's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 16th, 2002
    Posts
    7,632
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: I'm going with Texas

    And just to provide some FACTS to my argument that if you want to say Texas hadn't faced any defense all year, and tried to say/think that USC had. Here are some FACTS, read not opinions! Also note if you want to say that those numbers are affected by USC's numbers, just remember that Texas actually had higher offensive numbers, therefore they tilt them just as much or more.

    With regards to pass defense, Texas had faced one opponent who ranked in the year-end top 10 ratings, that being Texas Tech. USC also faced one top 10 pass defense, that would however be Texas. If you want to expand that out a bit, Texas had faced 3 teams in the top 50 (including Texas Tech), while USC had faced 3 teams as well, however one of those is Texas. (Texas faced 9th, 26th,37th while USC faced 5th{Texas),33rd and 49th)

    Ok so that was pass defense, how about rush defense.

    Texas had 4 games against Top 10 Rushing Defenses. Ohio State (1st), Oklahoma (5th) and Colorado (9th) twice. They played 6 games against top 50, the previous mentioned 4, and USC (24th) and Texas A&amp;M (45th). USC faced zero teams ranked in top 10 on rush defense. They faced five teams in top 50 however. The highest being Notre Dame (25th), followed by California (26th), Texas themselves (30th), Arkansas (37th) and Oregeon (41st).

    Now then, how about total defense.

    Texas played against 1 top 10 defense (that being Ohio State who was ranked 4th). They played 7 games against top 50 defenses, one of which is USC. They are Ohio State (4th), Oklahoma (16th), Kansas (19th), Texas Tech (26th), USC (40th) and Colorado (44th) twice. USC played against 1 top 10 defense as well. Of course that would be Texas which was ranked (6th). They played a total of 5 games against top 50 opponents. Texas (6th),Fresno State (34th), Arkansas (36th), California (47th) and Oregon (48th).

    Now then. I said before the game that Texas had at least faced some defenses, while USC hadn't. If you eliminate Texas from USCs schedule, and USC from Texas, the numbers are even more in favor of Texas, so when I say while I am not a Texas fan, they had at least played better defensive teams than USC had. Again, that's not my opinion, that is something backed up with facts.
    What we've got here is failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach, so you get what we had here last week which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it.

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •